Choose Orders Closure of Norwalk Courthouse, Consolidation with Stamford

Choose Orders Closure of Norwalk Courthouse, Consolidation with Stamford

A scarcity of courthouse employees and the “grossly inefficient” dealing with of legal instances has

A scarcity of courthouse employees and the “grossly inefficient” dealing with of legal instances has prompted the state’s high administrative decide to order the consolidation of Superior Court docket services in Stamford and Norwalk.

The Norwalk courthouse has been closed since March 2020 because of the pandemic, forcing its instances to be heard in Stamford, and won’t reopen for that goal underneath the order by Chief Court docket Administrator Choose Patrick L. Carroll III.

Choose Orders Closure of Norwalk Courthouse, Consolidation with Stamford
Choose Patrick L. Carroll III

“It’s clear that the best way operations are at the moment being carried out in Stamford, with Norwalk instances being dealt with solely two days every week, is a course of that can’t proceed,” Carroll wrote in an Aug. 24 e mail to employees obtained by CT Examiner.  “The way during which instances are at the moment being processed in Stamford is grossly inefficient and results in pointless delay within the processing and disposition of the instances. We merely want to search out and implement larger efficiencies. We can not proceed to function in Stamford as now we have for the previous 2.5 years.”

Carroll additionally wrote that “because of the persevering with lack of judicial department employees, notably safety employees in our Marshal Providers Unit, our means to renew regular court docket operations within the Norwalk GA continues to be a not possible prospect.”

In an announcement to CT Examiner on Thursday, Carroll mentioned the Norwalk courthouse just isn’t closing.  

“Enterprise will proceed to be carried out in Stamford/Norwalk because it has been carried out since early 2020,” he mentioned. “Quite than mendacity vacant and unused, the Norwalk constructing will proceed for use for essential judicial features. The Judicial Department will notice larger efficiencies by persevering with to handle, and additional streamlining, the mixed caseloads of Norwalk and Stamford in Stamford.” 

The Norwalk courthouse will home different Judicial Department features, together with the relocation of Grownup Probation places of work from a leased house now getting used, and a few group outreach features, he mentioned.

“We may even use the courtrooms and lock-up house as coaching services for a number of of our models, most notably, our Marshals,” Carroll mentioned in his e mail. 

Carroll additionally informed CT Examiner that the adjustments replicate “the elimination of in-person infractions dockets, and the truth that small claims instances and different issues corresponding to pre-trial conferences at the moment are being dealt with just about.”

“All of those concerns and our growing reliance on distant know-how make it not possible for the Department to return to something just like pre-pandemic operations within the Norwalk Courthouse,” he mentioned. “We’re happy {that a} reconfigured Norwalk Courthouse will stay an important a part of the group.”

The closure and consolidation might influence a case backlog that was drastically exacerbated by the pandemic, which basically halted in-person jury trials in any respect state courthouses. 

In-person trials resumed in June 2021.

Underneath Carroll’s order, the clerks’ places of work within the two courthouses can be merged into one and can be dealing with instances “5 days every week.”

“We intend to implement this modification as rapidly as potential,” Carroll wrote.

Carroll mentioned he has notified Choose John Blawie, Administrative Choose for the Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk, of the plan.

“He has assured me that he’ll work with the State’s Lawyer and the Public Defender in Stamford to guarantee that this transition is profitable,” Carroll wrote. “The present course of being utilized in Stamford to course of the Norwalk instances is grossly inefficient (and) results in pointless delay within the processing and disposition of the instances.”

Most instances are disposed of with no trial, which may usually take as much as a 12 months or extra to start after a defendant is charged.

If a defendant can not make bail and is jailed whereas awaiting trial, the continuing should start inside eight months. 

After that deadline passes, the defendant can file a movement for a speedy trial, and the costs are dismissed if that doesn’t occur inside 30 days.

Statewide, there was a backlog this spring of greater than 50,000 legal instances, down from a peak of about 80,000, in accordance with an article within the Connecticut Legislation Tribune.

Important backlogs additionally had been seen in civil and household issues. 


This story has been up to date to incorporate feedback by Carroll